<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting all defensive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2007/03/27/getting-all-defensive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2007/03/27/getting-all-defensive/</link>
	<description>Impish by nature.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kaziel</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2007/03/27/getting-all-defensive/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaziel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/?p=79#comment-48</guid>
		<description>From what I've read here and there, tank points are designed around Warrior tanking. Paladins (obviously) have different requirements for tanking than Warriors do, so the point values may not match up perfectly (remember it's even worse for Druids since they have no shields).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve read here and there, tank points are designed around Warrior tanking. Paladins (obviously) have different requirements for tanking than Warriors do, so the point values may not match up perfectly (remember it&#8217;s even worse for Druids since they have no shields).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
