<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burning Crusades Warlock Spell Hit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/03/06/warlock-spell-hit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/03/06/warlock-spell-hit/</link>
	<description>Impish by nature.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nibuca</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/03/06/warlock-spell-hit/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Nibuca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/03/06/warlock-spell-hit/#comment-943</guid>
		<description>"in her skivvies" literally means "if she stripped off all her clothes and fought in a simple black dress".  IE, this is what you see when gear is no affecting her +spell hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;in her skivvies&#8221; literally means &#8220;if she stripped off all her clothes and fought in a simple black dress&#8221;.  IE, this is what you see when gear is no affecting her +spell hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kikidas</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/03/06/warlock-spell-hit/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>Kikidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/03/06/warlock-spell-hit/#comment-942</guid>
		<description>Hehe. You put it better than I did in my blog, that's for certain.

By 'in her skivvies', I assume you mean 'in her gear'. 

I need to respec my suppression points, since I'm 'overhitting' (impossible!) with my affliction spells now, due to my spell hit having gone up. 

I hate respeccing. &#62;&#60;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe. You put it better than I did in my blog, that&#8217;s for certain.</p>
<p>By &#8216;in her skivvies&#8217;, I assume you mean &#8216;in her gear&#8217;. </p>
<p>I need to respec my suppression points, since I&#8217;m &#8216;overhitting&#8217; (impossible!) with my affliction spells now, due to my spell hit having gone up. </p>
<p>I hate respeccing. &gt;&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zardoz</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/03/06/warlock-spell-hit/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>zardoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/03/06/warlock-spell-hit/#comment-924</guid>
		<description>agreed - clear and simple. I understand it now. We'll happily consume all the theorycraft you care to send our way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed - clear and simple. I understand it now. We&#8217;ll happily consume all the theorycraft you care to send our way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeePee</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/03/06/warlock-spell-hit/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>TeePee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/03/06/warlock-spell-hit/#comment-923</guid>
		<description>as always, nicely explained - so much easier to read than when i tried to do it *sigh*

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as always, nicely explained - so much easier to read than when i tried to do it *sigh*</p>
<p> <img src='http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
