<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warlock Spell: Shadow Bolt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/</link>
	<description>Impish by nature.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TeePee</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1201</link>
		<dc:creator>TeePee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1201</guid>
		<description>or you could just use wowwiki :) pretty sure their numbers are the spec'less base values

TeePees last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Taptappewpew/~3/296199531/mythbuster-great-immolate-debate.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mythbuster: The Great Immolate Debate&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or you could just use wowwiki <img src='http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> pretty sure their numbers are the spec&#8217;less base values</p>
<p>TeePees last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Taptappewpew/~3/296199531/mythbuster-great-immolate-debate.html" rel="nofollow">Mythbuster: The Great Immolate Debate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nibuca</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>Nibuca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>So it turns out the base damage is influenced by your spec.  This is annoying and will need to be dealt with.  I guess at some point I'm going to respec and copy down tooltips while spec-less.  *sigh*  bother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it turns out the base damage is influenced by your spec.  This is annoying and will need to be dealt with.  I guess at some point I&#8217;m going to respec and copy down tooltips while spec-less.  *sigh*  bother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbf</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>mbf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>Hehe, I understand - I'm the same way.

Being an engineer means always trying to find the most efficient (or lazy - depends on you pov) way of doing something.

Affliction is necessarily more complicated anyway because of actual spell rotations (not just SB spam) - and the 4-piece bonus of t4 only complicates it with an extra tick of immolate and corruption changing the DoT refresh timing.

Good luck with your project - I look forward to seeing the results and how they match my own calculations.

I once tried to create comparative graphs of the DS/SnF build vs the ruin/MD succubus build with demonic tactics and demonic knowledge (stamina and intellect from gear and typical raid buffs on you and your succy into consideration).  It turned out to be a 4-dimensional graph which is a bit difficult to visualize.  In the end I had to pick certain sections of the graph, using spell damage/sta/int based on typical gearing.

It's a slightly better build at kara gear levels, but more spell damage makes shadow and flame beat out demonic knowledge because the bonus spell damage from +sta/+int doesn't scale as well (although you get +15.5% to all damage with soul link and md having your succubus out versus +15% to shadow only from saccing her with the typical destro build - and +5% crit from demonic tactics instead of 3% from backlash).

Of course you have to keep your demon alive...

Try working those into your SB function above, I dare you :)

And then thy nerfed demonic kowledge anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe, I understand - I&#8217;m the same way.</p>
<p>Being an engineer means always trying to find the most efficient (or lazy - depends on you pov) way of doing something.</p>
<p>Affliction is necessarily more complicated anyway because of actual spell rotations (not just SB spam) - and the 4-piece bonus of t4 only complicates it with an extra tick of immolate and corruption changing the DoT refresh timing.</p>
<p>Good luck with your project - I look forward to seeing the results and how they match my own calculations.</p>
<p>I once tried to create comparative graphs of the DS/SnF build vs the ruin/MD succubus build with demonic tactics and demonic knowledge (stamina and intellect from gear and typical raid buffs on you and your succy into consideration).  It turned out to be a 4-dimensional graph which is a bit difficult to visualize.  In the end I had to pick certain sections of the graph, using spell damage/sta/int based on typical gearing.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a slightly better build at kara gear levels, but more spell damage makes shadow and flame beat out demonic knowledge because the bonus spell damage from +sta/+int doesn&#8217;t scale as well (although you get +15.5% to all damage with soul link and md having your succubus out versus +15% to shadow only from saccing her with the typical destro build - and +5% crit from demonic tactics instead of 3% from backlash).</p>
<p>Of course you have to keep your demon alive&#8230;</p>
<p>Try working those into your SB function above, I dare you <img src='http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And then thy nerfed demonic kowledge anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nibuca</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>Nibuca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 04:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the pointer.  I will look into it.. but I'm one of -those- people.  Until I can prove it to myself "on paper" I can't believe the pat answers.  I will keep it in mind though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the pointer.  I will look into it.. but I&#8217;m one of -those- people.  Until I can prove it to myself &#8220;on paper&#8221; I can&#8217;t believe the pat answers.  I will keep it in mind though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbf</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1197</link>
		<dc:creator>mbf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 08:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1197</guid>
		<description>Just to keep things confusing, *some* tooltips are updated based on talents and some are not - same with gear differences.

*Some* buff tooltips are updated to take talents into account and some are not too.

Fun!

BTW, before you spend too much time on this, you may want to check out the wow warlock DPS spreadsheet:

http://www.leulier.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to keep things confusing, *some* tooltips are updated based on talents and some are not - same with gear differences.</p>
<p>*Some* buff tooltips are updated to take talents into account and some are not too.</p>
<p>Fun!</p>
<p>BTW, before you spend too much time on this, you may want to check out the wow warlock DPS spreadsheet:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.leulier.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.leulier.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeePee</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>TeePee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 23:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>ahhh that makes sense - i think there's an addon that does that isn't there? or is that game default? hehe been that long since i read tool tips like that in game i really don't remember

TeePees last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Taptappewpew/~3/296199531/mythbuster-great-immolate-debate.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mythbuster: The Great Immolate Debate&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahhh that makes sense - i think there&#8217;s an addon that does that isn&#8217;t there? or is that game default? hehe been that long since i read tool tips like that in game i really don&#8217;t remember</p>
<p>TeePees last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Taptappewpew/~3/296199531/mythbuster-great-immolate-debate.html" rel="nofollow">Mythbuster: The Great Immolate Debate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nibuca</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1195</link>
		<dc:creator>Nibuca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 23:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1195</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.  Screenshot was done this morning.  I -didn't- strip off all my clothes.. I'll try that tonight.  AFAIK the only buff I had active at the time was Fel Armor.

I -did- notice that I had to take off my wrist armor as they had haste and effected the cast time shown in the tooltip.

HRm.. it's also vaguely possible that the tooltip is adjusted by my talents.. bummer.. that'd make these kind of posts very hard to generate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.  Screenshot was done this morning.  I -didn&#8217;t- strip off all my clothes.. I&#8217;ll try that tonight.  AFAIK the only buff I had active at the time was Fel Armor.</p>
<p>I -did- notice that I had to take off my wrist armor as they had haste and effected the cast time shown in the tooltip.</p>
<p>HRm.. it&#8217;s also vaguely possible that the tooltip is adjusted by my talents.. bummer.. that&#8217;d make these kind of posts very hard to generate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeePee</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>TeePee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>As always, nice in depth post - I'm curious about the damage that's appearing on your screenshot for Shadowbolt though.  I had thought the base damage for SB is 541-603?  Really not meaning to be nit-picking your well researched post, its just your screenshot really surprised me - wondering if i'm going on old data or something and need to go update my post... /confused

TeePees last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Taptappewpew/~3/296199531/mythbuster-great-immolate-debate.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mythbuster: The Great Immolate Debate&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, nice in depth post - I&#8217;m curious about the damage that&#8217;s appearing on your screenshot for Shadowbolt though.  I had thought the base damage for SB is 541-603?  Really not meaning to be nit-picking your well researched post, its just your screenshot really surprised me - wondering if i&#8217;m going on old data or something and need to go update my post&#8230; /confused</p>
<p>TeePees last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Taptappewpew/~3/296199531/mythbuster-great-immolate-debate.html" rel="nofollow">Mythbuster: The Great Immolate Debate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leiandra</title>
		<link>http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>Leiandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicanery.fibergeek.com/2008/05/23/warlock-spell-shadow-bolt/#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>Not that I plan on ever pulling my lock (lvl 25) out of mothballs, but this is really good, useful information.  Thanks for the posts.

Leiandras last blog post..&lt;a href="http://zanderfin.blogspot.com/2008/05/revision-of-previous-post.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Revision of Previous Post&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I plan on ever pulling my lock (lvl 25) out of mothballs, but this is really good, useful information.  Thanks for the posts.</p>
<p>Leiandras last blog post..<a href="http://zanderfin.blogspot.com/2008/05/revision-of-previous-post.html" rel="nofollow">Revision of Previous Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
